语言与理解——伽达默尔诠释学的“语言转向”及其对实用主义哲学的影响  

Language and Understanding The “Turn of Language” in Gadamer's Hermeneutics and Its Influence on Pragmatism Philosophy

作　　者：殷杰[1] 何华[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西大学科学技术哲学研究中心,山西太原030006

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2012年第3期28-32,共5页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(2009JJD720017);山西省软科学研究项目(2011041050-01)

摘　　要：伽达默尔诠释学的"语言转向"开始于《真理与方法》的第三部分。转向使其诠释学实现普遍化并可能成功应对招致的指责,即认为他的诠释学有相对主义和主观主义的倾向。实用主义哲学阵营中罗蒂十分重视伽达默尔的哲学。麦克道尔的哲学明显有来自伽达默尔诠释学和语言观的启迪,由此形成了不同于笛卡儿传统的关于知识、心灵与世界关系方面问题的分析理路。这可以说明伽达默尔的诠释学与实用主义哲学有相似之处。The 'turn of language ' in Gadamer's hermeneutics begun with the third part of Truth and Method.It made the hermeneutics universalized and possi ble to successfully deal with the consequent criticism,that is,blaming that the hermeneutics had the inclination of subjectivism and relativism.Among the pragmatism philosophers Richard Rorty paid more attention to it.Clearly enlightened by Gadamer's hermeneutics and language view,John McDowell's philosophy formed his own approach that was different from Cartesian traditional one to the problems of knowledge,mind and world relations,which reflects the similarity between Gadamer's hermeneutics and pragmatism philosophy.

关 键 词：诠释学 语言转向 相对主义 实用主义 

分 类 号：B08[哲学宗教—哲学理论]