检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王春[1]
出 处:《政法学刊》2012年第3期41-48,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law
基 金:广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划项目(项目编号:GD11XFX10)
摘 要:我国民事诉讼发回重审制度的设计与运作的理论依据存有缺陷,是发回重审制度存在诸多问题的重要原因。该制度的设计与运作应当以维护当事人的审级利益,保障程序公正价值的实现,维持上下级法院职能分工为理论基础。基此,我国民诉法修改时,必须重新设定发回重审的事由,赋予当事人程序选择权,明确规定发回重审使用判决书,规定撤销发回判决中判断理由的拘束效力。It is believed that the theoretical basis of the design and operation of civil case remand and retrial is defective,which contributes to a range of issues in the said institution.The design and operation of this institution are supposed to be based on the theoretical framework that is aimed to safeguard the trial interests of parties in action,ensure the realization of procedural justice and maintain the different functions of the higher and lower courts.In view of this,the modification of civil procedure law shall reset the causes of remand and retrial,conferring the litigant's right to choose procedures,explicitly stipulating the use of court verdict in terms of remand and retrial,and the binding force of justification for revoking remand and retrial.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222