检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汤景桢[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学法学院,上海200438
出 处:《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2013年第3期77-80,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
摘 要:刑诉法的再次修改恢复了案卷移送制度,这是基于对司法实践的反思作出的理性选择,有利于保障辩护方的阅卷权,防止公诉权的滥用,节约诉讼成本,提高诉讼效率。但是,与刑事公诉案件移送方式密切相关的庭前审查程序并没有随之进行相应的修改。形式简略、功能单一、无法排除法官预断的庭前审查程序不仅会影响到设计案卷移送制度恢复时所预期的目的,而且必将与其产生难以调和的矛盾。因此,案卷移送制度的恢复要求进一步改革和完善我国的刑事庭前审查程序。The second revision of the criminal procedure law adopts conveyance of all dossiers,which is a rational choice based on the judicial practice reflection and will be conducive to protect the rights of the defense,to prevent the abuses of public prosecution right,to save costs,to improve the efficiency of lawsuit.But the criminal pretrial review procedure related to the mode of criminal prosecution closely is not amended accordingly.Criminal pretrial review procedure is simple and cannot exclude the judge prejudges,which will not only affect the expected purpose of the recovery of conveyance of all dossiers,but also produce the conflict.Therefore,the recovery of conveyance of all dossiers demands reformation and perfection of our country's criminal pretrial review procedure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222