詹森派视野中的“利玛窦规矩”——以《耶稣会士的实用伦理学》第二卷为中心  

"Matteo Ricci Rules" in the View of the Jansenists:On the Volume 2 of Jesus's Practical Ethics

作　　者：黄佳[1] 

机构地区：[1]中共浙江省委党校社会学文化学教研部,杭州311121

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2013年第9期122-128,121+159,共9页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：浙江省社联课题"明末清初中西文化双向互动研究";杭州市规划课题"耶稣会决疑论与儒家经权说比较研究"(B12WH07)

摘　　要：本文以法国詹森主义者康布·德·本特夏托(Sebastien-Joseph du Cambout de Coislin de Pontchateau)批判耶稣会在华传教策略的论争文献——《耶稣会士的实用伦理学》第二卷——为研究个案,指出耶稣会在欧洲的敌对力量——詹森主义(jansenism)——对"利玛窦规矩"所持的批评态度和立场。文本资料上,詹森主义者详尽掌握着1652年以前欧洲有关中国礼仪之争的材料;价值立场上,他们更加认同多明我会士和方济各会士的传教方式。詹森主义者对中国礼仪和耶稣会在华传教策略的贬抑和排斥根源上是由于双方在神学理论和伦理学体系上的差异决定的。但詹森主义者用以衡量、评判耶稣会在华传教策略的严格主义(Rigorism)道德立场在17、18世纪清教主义盛行的法国社会和奉行教会自主原则(Gallicanism)的法兰西教会内赢得了为数众多的支持者,使詹森派在与耶稣会的争论中在舆论上获得了极大的成功、产生了很大的影响,而詹森主义者对"利玛窦规矩"的批评态度反过来也助长了法兰西教会对耶稣会一直抱持的敌对态度。Studying the volume 2of Jesus' s Practical Ethics,which was written by Sebastien-Joseph du Cambout de Coislin de Pontchateau to criticize the preach strategies of Jesuit in China,the paper indicated that the criticism attitude to'Matteo Ricci Rules'of Jansenism,which was the hostile forces of Jesuit.Jansenism had the materials about Chinese rites controversy before 1652,and they more agreed with the preach methods of Ordo Dominicanorum and Ordo Fratrum Minorum.Jansenism belittled the preach strategies of Chinese rites and Jesuit because of the differences between both theology and ethnics.However,Jansenism obtained a lot of supporters of the French church in the 17th and 18th century because of their Rigorism,so that they achieved great success and influences in the debate with Jesuit.And the criticism attitude to'Matteo Ricci Rules'of Jansenism fostered the hostile attitude of the French church to Jesuit.

关 键 词：詹森主义 利玛窦规矩 中国礼仪之争 耶稣会 多明我会 

分 类 号：B978[哲学宗教—宗教学]