民事诉讼案件待证事实的确定  

Certainty of Factum Probandum in the Civil Procedure

作　　者：张海燕[1,2,3] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院 [2]中国人民大学法学院 [3]<山东大学法律评论>,主编。济南250100

出　　处：《南京大学法律评论》2010年第1期156-169,共14页Nanjing University Law Review

基　　金：刘保玉教授主持的国家社科基金项目(08BFX070);山东省哲学社会科学规划项目(07JDB012)“民事实体法和程序法的制度衔接与规则协调”的前期成果之一。

摘　　要：民事诉讼案件事实的认定是民事诉讼活动的中心任务,其认定过程分为从主张事实到待证事实再到裁判事实两个阶段。目前,民诉学界对于第二阶段即如何运用证据证明待证事实的研究已非常深入,但对于第一阶段即案件待证事实的确定过程却很少有人问津,甚至认为其是一个显而易见的前提。实际并非如此,民事诉讼案件待证事实的确定也是一个内含复杂逻辑推演的过程,是一个当事人的主张事实经实体法律规范内含的要件事实涵摄表现为程序上的主要事实再经当事人是否存在争议的筛选形成待证事实的过程。In civil procedure,the fact-finding is the central task of the action of civil litigation.And its process can be divided into two phases:from the claim fact to factum probandum and to the adjudicative fact.Now,the study on the second phase(that is how to prove the factum probandum with evidence materials) is already very thorough.However, very little people pay attention to the first phase(that is the certainty process of factum probandum),they even consider it as an obvious premise.But it' s not true.The certainty of factum probandum in civil procedure is a complex process with logic inference,which formed from the claim facts of parties to the principal facts which subsumed by the requirement facts included in the substantive law,and next to the factum probandum which screed by whether the disputes between the parties exist or not.

关 键 词：主张事实 要件事实 主要事实 待证事实 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]