检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨振山[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学,北京100088
出 处:《政法论坛》2000年第4期136-148,共13页Tribune of Political Science and Law
摘 要:法学教育是法律的基本问题,而法律是宪政的基本问题。在中国传统历史中,“有系统的社会管制”所对应的不是法,而是中国特有的“礼”。1840年以前,中国无西方意义上的法学教育;1840年至 1949年,中国法学教育进入近代时期,从无到有,出现了一个极为兴盛的局面;1949年以后,中国现代法学教育从头开始,经历了曲折的发展过程,为适应社会主义市场经济体制的需要,完善我国法学教育事业还任重而道远。Legal education is a basic question of law, while law is the basic question of constitutional government. In Chinese tradition and history, what is corresponding to 'systematic social public surveillance' is not law, but 'li' which is particularly possessed by China. Before 1840, China had no legal education like that of western countries. From 1840 to 1949, legal education in China entered the modern period and it was in a very prosperous state. Since 1949, modern legal education in China started from the very beginning and underwent a complicated development. The burden is heavy and the road is long to meet the need of marketing economic system of socialism, and to perfect legal education course in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229