检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东工业大学
出 处:《体育学刊》1999年第4期23-25,共3页Journal of Physical Education
摘 要:随着体育教学改革的深入,考核改革(包括考核制度和考核方法)必然提上议事日程。否则,即使在教学内容和课程体系方面进行了改革,而考核制度和考核方法依旧,仍不能达到预期的教学目标。本文从体育课考核的功能出发,对现今我国普通高校体育课考核方法存在的弊端进行剖析和探讨,并提出自己的看法。In pace with the in depth PE teaching reform, the reform of check-up methods(including the check-up regulations and methods) will be inevitably brought up to the agenda. Even if the teaching contents and curriculum system reform are proceeded, the expected purpose of teaching can not be achieved if the check-up regulations and methods remain the sa-cue. Proceeding from the function of PE lesson check-up, this article Presents analysis and investigation on the defects of the present PE lesson check-up methods in China's general colleges and universities, as well as the author's opinion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28