检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周安平[1]
出 处:《上海大学学报(社会科学版)》1999年第5期69-74,共6页Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:针对民事再审程序提起主体的若干争议问题 ,本文认为人民法院对本院已经发生法律效力的判决、裁定 ,其提起再审程序的主体既不是本院院长 ,也不是审判委员会 ,而是“本法院”。法律应当规定地方人民检察院对同级人民法院已经发生法律效力的判决、裁定 ,发现有法定抗诉情形的 ,有权直接向同级人民法院提出抗诉 ,而没有必要提请上级人民检察院提出抗诉。There have been disputes over the issue of who should be entitled to bring retrial proceedings in a civil lawsuit. This paper holds that for those court decisions which are made by“this court”and which have gone into effect, the subject entitled to bring retrial proceedings should be “this court”, not President of the court or the Trial Committee of the court. In the meantime, the law should stipulate that once the basic-level people's procuratorate sees that the court decision which is made by the court at the same level and which has gone into effect is not in strict line with the law, this basic-level people's procuratorate, instead of applying for intervention from the people's procuratorate at the higher level, should be authorized to counterappeal Finally, the litigant, whose position as the subject to bring retrial proceedings in a civil lawsuit must also be safeguarded.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104