海峡两岸犯罪过失中“应当预见”问题的比较研究  

COMPARISON AND RESEARCH ON PROBLEM OF "DUE FORESIGHT" IN CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE ON THE MAINLAND AND ACROSS THE TAIWAN STRAIT

作　　者：刘志伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《河北法学》1996年第2期12-16,共5页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：本文通过对海峡两岸刑法理论关于犯罪过失中“应当预见”问题的各种观点的比较评析．认为：犯罪过失中“应当预见”的内容是具体的危害社会的结果、行为与结果间的因果关系及危害结果发生的可能性。并进一步在分析犯罪过失的立法精神、人的认识能力等方面的基础上指出．犯罪过失行为人应当预见的具体的危害社会结果应指刑法分则针对犯罪过失所规定的具体的严重危害社会的结果．但这又不是绝对具体的结果．而是相对具体的结果。Through a comparative veview of several views toward the problem of 'DueForesight' in criminal negligence in criminal law theories of the Maimland and Taiwan the author argues that the contents of 'Due Foresight' in criminal ngligence are concrete results doing harm to the society, the causation between the act and the outcome and the possibility of the occurance of harmful results. On the basis of the analysis toward the law-making essences of criminal negligence and human being's cognitive ability. the author holds that the concrete results which do harm to the society and should be foreseen by the actor . ought to be the particular results which do serious harm to the society and are stipulated by the special provisions of the criminal law code about criminal negligence . These results are not absolutely concrete ones. but comparativly concrete ones.

关 键 词：危害结果 犯罪过失 应当预见 行为人 海峡两岸 危害社会 过失犯罪 刑法分则 认识能力 预见到 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]