检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张潮生[1]
出 处:《语言研究》1994年第1期36-55,共20页Studies in Language and Linguistics
摘 要:本文试图从八个方面讨论各家设立的语义关系不一致的一些原因。本文指出,由于对复合的、意义笼统的、指向不同的、用于隐喻的、角度或类型不同的语义关系以及对意义在句法与词汇之间的分配方式、没有在表层上出现的成分、与意义不直接对应的句法形式等问题可以采取多种处理方式,所以语义关系不一致的情况在目前几乎是不可避免的。本文还对语义关系的某些现象提出与其他研究者不同的看法。This paper discusses some factors which cause disagreements among semantic relations proposed by different authors from eight perspectives. It is pointed out in this paper that these disagreements are almost unavoidable at present because there are a number of alternatives to deal with semantic relations which are compound, vague in rneaning, with different scope,used metaphorically, or of different kinds, as well as alternatives to deal with assignment of meaning between syntactic and lexical forms, constituents not appearing in surface structure,and syntactic forms not in direct correspondence with meaning. Views on certain phenomena shown by semantic relations and different from other authors' are also given.
关 键 词:语义关系 句法形式 客体 复合关系 名词性成分 不及物动词 研究者 因果关系 词汇形式 JACKENDOFF
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.119