检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘莲玉[1]
机构地区:[1]福建师范大学体育科学学院,福建福州350007
出 处:《福建师大福清分校学报》2013年第2期72-77,共6页Journal of Fuqing Branch of Fujian Normal University
摘 要:通过运用专家访谈、数理统计和文献资料等方法对福建省第十四届大学生运动会竞技健美操决赛关于裁判员对竞赛评判情况进行客观性分析。结果表明:三个决赛项目的艺术和完成裁判评分客观性系数比较高,评分标准较为一致,但评分区分度不高,评分极差较大。说明裁判员的业务水平相对较低,影响比赛结果可信度。进而提出提高裁判员评分客观性的建议:提高裁判员的专业水平,增多裁判员的实践机会,合理处理评分误差,从质量上提高裁判员队伍。从而促进福建省今后健美操竞赛裁判工作向着更加科学化、公正化的方向发展。This paper analyzed the objectivity of the referees’scoring in aerobics competition in 14th University Games in Fujian based on expert interview,mathematical statistics and methods of literature.The results show that: the objectivity coefficient of the referees’scoring in athletes’art performance and action accomplishment is relatively high in the three finals;the standard of scoring is basically the same,but differentiation degrees are poor which show the relatively low level of referee affecting the credibility of the results of the competition.Accordingly,suggestions for the referee score objectivity are as follow: improve the referee’s professionalism by more practical training;improve the quality and quantity of referee team so that the referee’s judgment will be more scientific and fair in future aerobics competition in Fujian.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38