检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张滇波[1]
出 处:《南昌教育学院学报》2013年第9期10-11,18,共3页Journal of Nanchang College of Education
摘 要:"斯密教条"的性质在我国素为定论,而钱伯海通过"重新研究",认定"斯密教条"是一个"很为精湛的见解和发现",马克思对其批判有误。他得出结论:从社会看是活劳动创造价值,从企业看是物化劳动创造价值,从而物活劳动共同创造价值。并在此基础上提出了他自己的社会劳动价值论。由于斯密教条与国民经济核算的基础理论密切相关,因而一度引发激烈争论。由于论战双方对于马克思批判"斯密教条"的要点都未能尽义,因而本文力图阐明问题的实质,并指出钱伯海理论的根本性错误。The nature of "Smith doctrine" is the conclusion in China,and Qian Bo-hai through the "re study",to think that "Smith doctrine" is a "very sophisticated insights and discoveries," Marx had error on the critical.He came to the conclusion: from the perspective of society living labor creates value,look from the enterprise is materialized labor creates value,thus living labor create value together.And on this basis,put forward his own theory of social labor value.The basic theory of Smith doctrine and national economic accounting are closely related,so once triggered fierce debate.As the debate both sides points for a critique of Marx "Smith doctrine" has failed to do justice to the essence,so this article tries to expound the problem,and points out that the fundamental error of Qian Bo-hai theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15