论不作为侵权责任中因果关系之认定  

Determination of Causation in the Tort Liability Arising from Omissions

作　　者：杨垠红[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学法学院,福建福州350108

出　　处：《南阳师范学院学报》2013年第8期1-6,共6页Journal of Nanyang Normal University

基　　金：2013年教育部人文社会科学研究项目"多因不明侵权中比例责任理论及其司法适用"(13YZC820092);福建省社会科学规划项目"侵权法上比例原则及其司法适用"(2012C096)

摘　　要：若要侵权人承担责任,则因果关系认定是必不可少的。在不作为侵权责任中,因果关系认定尤显困难。根据是否有介入因素、介入因素之不同,可分为三种情形:一是不存在自然力或第三人行为介入的情形下,不作为与损害后果之间因果关系的认定;二是在自然力介入时,不作为与损害后果之间因果关系的认定;三是在第三人不法行为介入时,不作为与损害后果之间因果关系的认定。其中条件规则、相当因果关系规则、可预见规则、比例因果关系规则、替代原因规则均发挥着重要的作用。Causation is a key factor in deciding whether any liability should be imposed on a tort-feasor,and it is more difficult to determine causation in cases involving tort liability for omission.According to the difference in intervening factors,three different circumstances can be established: one is the determination of causation when natural force or the third party does not interfere;one is the determination of causation when natural force interferes;and another is the determination of causation when the third party interferes.Besides,condictio sine qua non,the adequate theory,the foreseeability rule,the proportional causation rule and the superseding causation rule all play an important role therein.

关 键 词：不作为侵权责任 比例因果关系 替代原因规则 

分 类 号：G65[文化科学—教育学]