检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪泳[1] 张方信[1] 邓尚新[1] 常宗宏[1] 冯娟[1] 王静舞[1] 贾红梅[1]
机构地区:[1]兰州军区兰州总医院消化科,甘肃兰州730050
出 处:《兰州大学学报(医学版)》2013年第3期56-59,共4页Journal of Lanzhou University(Medical Sciences)
摘 要:目的分析超声内镜(EUS)检查对食管胃结合部腺癌术前TN分期的准确性,评价其临床应用价值。方法接受外科手术切除的91例经病理证实且.临床资料完整的食管胃结合部腺癌患者,均于术前进行了EUS检查,结合术后病理分期进行对比分析。结果 EUS对食管胃结合部腺癌术前T分期的准确率分别为T_1 95.6%、T_2 91.5%、T_3 85.7%、T_4 90.1%,总的准确率为81.3%;EUS对食管胃结合部腺癌淋巴结转移判断的敏感度较高,分别为No 78.3%和N^+89.7%,总的准确度为86.8%,对于较大淋巴结(直径>1 cm)的判断较为准确,对于远处转移的淋巴结有局限性。结论 EUS可准确判断食管胃结合部腺癌的TN分期为手术方案的制订提供依据。Objective To explore the clinical value of endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS) in the preoperative tumor and nodal(TN) metastasis staging of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction(AEG).Methods Ninety-one pathologically proven AEG patients with full clinical data,who had received preoperative EUS check and surgical resection,were studied,together with the contrastive analysis of their postoperative pathologic staging.Results The accuracy of EUS in determining the T stage of AEG were T<sub>1</sub> 95.6%,T<sub>2</sub> 91.5%,T<sub>3</sub> 85.7%,T<sub>4</sub> 90.1%,,respectively.The total accuracy of T staging with EUS was 81.3%.The sensitivity of EUS for N staging was higher and it was N<sub>0</sub> 78.3%,N<sup>+</sup> 89.7%,respectively.The total accuracy of N staging with EUS was 86.8%.It was easy for EUS to determine the lymph node metastasis status of relatively large lymph node whose diameter was larger than 1.0 cm,but as to the distant lymph node EUS was helpless.Conclusion EUS is higher in accuracy degree and can be applied to provide guidancefor working out rational operation methods.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28