Immunological protection of small bowel by simultaneously transplanted liver graft in pigs  

作　　者：Yin, Zhen-Yu Li, Ning Wang, Xiao-Ming Ni, Xiao-Dong Jiang, Feng Li, You-Sheng Li, Jie-Shou[1] 

机构地区：[1]Nanjing Univ, Sch Med, Jinling Hosp, Inst Gen Surg, Nanjing 210002, Peoples R China [2]Xiamen Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Xiamen 361004, Peoples R China

出　　处：《Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International》2009年第4期363-369,共7页国际肝胆胰疾病杂志（英文版）

基　　金：supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(30872484)

摘　　要：BACKGROUND: A simultaneously transplanted liver shields a bowel graft from immunologic attack in small animals, while the possible immuno-tolerance induced by the liver in liver and small bowel transplantation (LSBT) is uncertain in large animal models. To investigate the clinically suspected beneficial effect of the liver on small bowel allograft, we developed a new model of composite LSBT in the pig. METHODS: Seventy outbred long-white pigs were randomized into four groups. LSBT without immunosuppressive treatment (n=10, group A); LSBT with routine immunosuppressive treatment (n=10, group B); LSBT with a lower dose of immunosuppressive treatment (n=10, group C); and small bowel segment allotransplantation without immunosuppressive treatment (n=10, group D). RESULTS: There was no remarkable difference in survival time between groups A and D (10.33 vs. 12.89 days, P>0.05), but the initial time of acute rejection of the intestinal graft in group A was clearly delayed when compared to group D (8.22 vs. 4.33 days, P<0.05), and the rejection scores in group A were remarkably lower than those in group D at each postoperative time point (0 vs. 0.44 on day 3, P<0.05; 0.22 vs. 1.78 on day 5, P<0.05; 1.11 vs. 2.56 on day 7, P<0.05). There were evident differences in postoperative survival time, initial time of acute rejection and postoperative rejection scores between groups A, B and C. Postoperative survival time (30.00 vs. 28.13 days, P>0.05), initial acute rejection time (25.40 vs. 22.13 days, P>0.05) or rejection score did not differ between groups B and C within one postoperative month. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to isolated segment small bowel allotransplantation, the intestinal graft in LSBT (group A) had a delayed initial time of acute rejection and a lower postoperative acute rejection score, and a lower dose of immunosuppressive treatment led to persistent graft immuno-tolerance in LSBT. Thus the simultaneously transplanted liver graft may reduce the risk of intestinal rejection and protect the bowel graft from severBACKGROUND: A simultaneously transplanted liver shields a bowel graft from immunologic attack in small animals, while the possible immuno-tolerance induced by the liver in liver and small bowel transplantation (LSBT) is uncertain in large animal models. To investigate the clinically suspected beneficial effect of the liver on small bowel allograft, we developed a new model of composite LSBT in the pig. METHODS: Seventy outbred long-white pigs were randomized into four groups. LSBT without immunosuppressive treatment (n=10, group A); LSBT with routine immunosuppressive treatment (n=10, group B); LSBT with a lower dose of immunosuppressive treatment (n=10, group C); and small bowel segment allotransplantation without immunosuppressive treatment (n=10, group D). RESULTS: There was no remarkable difference in survival time between groups A and D (10.33 vs. 12.89 days, P>0.05), but the initial time of acute rejection of the intestinal graft in group A was clearly delayed when compared to group D (8.22 vs. 4.33 days, P<0.05), and the rejection scores in group A were remarkably lower than those in group D at each postoperative time point (0 vs. 0.44 on day 3, P<0.05; 0.22 vs. 1.78 on day 5, P<0.05; 1.11 vs. 2.56 on day 7, P<0.05). There were evident differences in postoperative survival time, initial time of acute rejection and postoperative rejection scores between groups A, B and C. Postoperative survival time (30.00 vs. 28.13 days, P>0.05), initial acute rejection time (25.40 vs. 22.13 days, P>0.05) or rejection score did not differ between groups B and C within one postoperative month. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to isolated segment small bowel allotransplantation, the intestinal graft in LSBT (group A) had a delayed initial time of acute rejection and a lower postoperative acute rejection score, and a lower dose of immunosuppressive treatment led to persistent graft immuno-tolerance in LSBT. Thus the simultaneously transplanted liver graft may reduce the risk of intestinal rejection and protect the bowel graft from sever

关 键 词：liver transplantation small bowel transplantation PORCINE ALLOTRANSPLANTATION rejection immuno-tolerance 

分 类 号：R657.3[医药卫生—外科学]