检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:顾沈阳[1] 俞俊杰[1] 刘亚东[1,2] 王业华[1] 杜拥军[1]
机构地区:[1]苏北人民医院,225001 [2]盐城市第三人民医院,224001
出 处:《实用癌症杂志》2014年第1期41-44,共4页The Practical Journal of Cancer
基 金:江苏省卫生厅基金资助项目(H 200769)
摘 要:目的探讨荧光原位杂交法(FISH)及全自动图像细胞法(ICM)对膀胱肿瘤的诊断价值。方法对20例非尿路上皮癌和40例膀胱肿瘤患者的尿液采用全自动图像细胞法及FISH、进行尿细胞学检查。另对确诊的45例膀胱肿瘤患者肿瘤组织及10例排除膀胱肿瘤患者的正常膀胱黏膜,行流式细胞VEGF及VEGFR检测。结果 FISH的敏感性显著高于ICM的敏感性(P<0.05)和常规尿细胞学的敏感性(P<0.05),同时ICM敏感性也显著高于常规尿细胞学的敏感性(P<0.05);ICM、FISH和常规尿脱落细胞学检测的敏感性与患者病理分期无相关性(P>0.05),但与肿瘤病理分级显著相关(P<0.05)。结论 FISH对膀胱尿路上皮癌诊断的敏感性高于ICM和尿细胞学检查。VEGF、VEGFR定量分析可作为膀胱肿瘤的生物学行为评估方法之一。Objective To study the application of fluorescence in situ hybridization and Automated Image Cytometry in the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma of bladder and the expression of VEGF and VEGFR .Methods 60 patients were divided in-to two groups ,40 patients were diagnosed as urothelial carcinoma of bladder by pathology and 20 healthy individuals as control group.2Urine was collected and tested by ICM ,2FISH,cytology.The tissue of bladder cancer from 45 patients who have been as diagnosed bladder cancer and the mucosa of normal bladder was tested by FCM .Results Overall sensitivity of FISH was signifi-cantly higher than that of ICM (P<0.05) and urine cytology (P<0.05),and ICM was more sensitive than urine cytology (P<0.05).Sensitivities of ICM,FISH and urine cytology had significant correlation with grade (P<0.05).Conclusion FISH have significantly higher sensitivity in diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma of bladder than ICM and urine cytology .VEGF and VEGFR may be a new method in evaluation of bladder cancer .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49