负压引流及皮片引流在腮腺切除术中的疗效观察及比较  

A Comparative Observation of Negative Pressure Drainage and Rubber Drainage in Parotid Gland Surgery

作　　者：汤晶[1] 葛自力[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学附属第一医院口腔科,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《中国血液流变学杂志》2014年第1期91-93,共3页Chinese Journal of Hemorheology

摘　　要：目的：通过分析两种引流在腮腺切除术中的临床疗效，探讨负压引流在腮腺切除术中的应用价值。方法将269例接受腮腺切除术的患者随机分成负压引流组（A组，135例）和皮片引流组（B组，134例），观察并记录2组的住院天数、一期愈合率和并发症发生率。结果 A组较B组住院天数短、提高了一期愈合率和减少了并发症发生率。结论负压引流的临床疗效优于皮片引流，值得在临床上推广使用。Objective To observe the efficacy of the application of negative pressure drainage and rubber drainage in patients with parotid gland surgery. Methods 269 patients receiving parotidectomy were randomly divided into negative pressure drainage group (Group A, 135 patients) and rubber drainage group (Group B, 134 patients). Healing efficacy of these two methods were in terms of the hospital days, first stage healing rate and the incidences of complications, such as hematoma, effusion, necrosis of skin flap and salivary fistula. Results Group A had the advantages of shorter hospital days, less complications and the improved first stage healing rate. Conclusion Negative pressure drainage is superior to rubber drainage in parotid gland surgery. It is worth extending for its clinical application.

关 键 词：腮腺切除术 负压引流 皮片引流 

分 类 号：R781.7[医药卫生—口腔医学]