检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢耀振[1] 黄显实[1] 农先胜[1] 林伟芬[1] 梁荣中[1] 黄任贵[1]
出 处:《航空航天医学杂志》2009年第11期47-49,共3页Journal of Aerospace medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨后程加速超分割放射治疗N3期鼻咽癌临床疗效。方法:60例N3期鼻咽癌患者随机分为后程加速超分割放射治疗组(LCAF组)30例,常规分割放射治疗组(CF组)30例。其中LCAF组先用常规分割照射,2.0 Gy/次,5次/周,放量达36~40 Gy后改用LCAF照射,1.5 Gy/次,2次/d,中间间隔6~8 h,每周放疗5 d,休息2 d,鼻咽癌放疗总量约68~76 Gy/6~6.5周,颈部放疗量为60~70 Gy/5.5~6周。CF组全部按常规分割放射治疗,鼻咽部放疗量为72~76 Gy/7~7.5 w,颈部放疗量为60~70 Gy/6~7 w。结果:鼻咽部肿瘤完全缓解率(CR)LCAF组和CF组分别为86.7%(26/30)、60%(18/30);颈部淋巴结完全缓解率(CR)LCAF组和CF组分别为90%(27/30)、56.6%(17/30),两组间比较有显著性意义(P【0.05)。1、3、5年生存率LCAF组分别为86.7%、73.3%、23.3%,CF组分别为80%、66.7%、20%,两组间差异无显著性意义(P】0.05)。鼻咽部5年局部控制率LCAF组为93.3%,CF组为80%;颈部淋巴结5年局部控制率LCAF组为86.7%,CF组为73.3%,两组间差异无显著性意义(P】0.05)。两组放疗毒副反应也无显著差异(P】0.05)。结论:后速加速超分割放射治疗N3期鼻咽癌较常规分割放射治疗具有更好近期疗效,但未能提高5年生存率及局部控制率,有必要扩大病例并作长期随访研究。Objective:To detect the clinical results of late course accelerated hyperfractionation(LCAF) radiotherapy in stage N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC) patients.Methods:60 NPC patients in stage N3 were divided into conventionl(CF) and LCAF radiotherapy groups.Patients in CF group received conventional radiotherapy:the total dose of nasopharyngeal was 72~76 Gy in 7~7.5 w,and cervical lymphnode was 60~70 Gy in 6~7 w(2.0 Gy/f,5 f/w);Patients in LCAF group were treated with the same fractionation as CF group until the dose of 36~40 Gy,and then followed by LCAF radiotherapy :1.5 Gy/f,2 fractions a day with 6~8 hour interval between two fractions to the total dose of 68~76 Gy in nasopharyngeal and 60~70 Gy in cervical lymphnode.Results:The complete response rate in the nasopharyngeal was 86.7% in LCAF group and 60% in the CF group at the end of the course: the complete response rate in the in the cervical lymphnode was 90% in LCAF group and 56.6% in the CF group,with the different between the two groups significant(P<0.05).The1-,3-and 5-year survival rates were 86.7%、73.3%、23.3% in the LCAF group,and 80%、66.7%、 20% in CF group,there was not any significant difference between two groups(P>0.05).The 5-year local control rate of the nasopharyngeal was 93.3% in the LCAF group,and 80% in CF group;the rate of cervical lymphnode was 86.7% in LCAF group and 73.3% in the CF group,without finding any significant difference between two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in radiation reaction between two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions:The LCAF radiotherapy can impove the preliminary results than conventional CF in stage N3 of NPC.But do not improve the survival rate and local control rates.It is worth further study.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3