检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韦富贵[1]
机构地区:[1]柳州市人民医院耳鼻咽喉科,广西柳州545006
出 处:《中国生化药物杂志》2014年第4期125-127,130,共3页Chinese Journal of Biochemical Pharmaceutics
基 金:广西卫生厅医学自筹项目基金(Z0654)
摘 要:目的探讨布地奈德混悬液喷射雾化吸入治疗耳鼻喉科急性炎症患者的临床效果。方法选取柳州市人民医院2010年4月至2013年4月收治的耳鼻喉科急性炎症患者120例,按随机数字表分为对照组(n=60)及治疗组(n=60)。对照组给予常规超声雾化液,治疗组给予布地奈德混悬液喷射雾化吸入,2组连续使用5 d。对比2组患者治疗后声音嘶哑、咽部疼痛、咽部异物感、呼吸困难状况改善情况及上述状况改善平均时间。结果治疗组咽部疼痛、咽部异物感、呼吸困难、声音嘶哑治疗总有效率和平均改善时间均优于对照组,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论布地奈德混悬液喷射雾化吸入治疗耳鼻咽喉科急性炎症相对于常规超声雾化液吸入治疗,效果较好。Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of Budesonide spray atomization inhalation on ear-nose-pharyngeal-throat acute inflammation.Methods 120 patients with ear-nose-pharyngeal-throat acute inflammation were slected from April 2010 to April 2013 in Liuzhou People’s Hospital.They were randomly divided into control group(n=60 )and observation group (n=60 ).The patients in observation group were treated with budesonide spray atomization inhalation,while the patients in control group were treated with conventional ultrasonic aerosol inhalation,continous use for 5 days.Compare the improvement of throat pain,pharyngeal foreign body sensation,dyspnea,hoarseness and the average improving time after treatment in two groups. Results The total effective rate of throat pain,pharyngeal foreign body sensation,dyspnea,hoarseness and the average improving time in observation group was significantly better than that in control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05 ).Conclusion Compared with conventional ultrasonic atomization inhalation,the efficacy of budesonide spray atomization inhalation on ear-nose-pharyngeal-throat acute inflammation is better.
分 类 号:R856.76[医药卫生—航空、航天与航海医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.238.221