刑事审判权的制约与监督  

The “Checking” and the “Supervision” to the Jurisdiction in Criminal Procedure

作　　者：周标龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]衡阳师范学院经济与法律系,湖南衡阳421008

出　　处：《中南林业科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第2期52-56,共5页Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology（Social Sciences）

基　　金：2011年度湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目:<刑事诉讼权力制约机制研究>(编号:11YBA036)

摘　　要：我国通过刑事诉讼法构建了制约和监督两种审判权制约机制。审判权制约机制对于保障审判权合法的、正当的行使发挥了重要作用,但审判监督制度一直不能有效运作。由于审判监督不符合刑事审判的规律,因此我国在防止刑事审判权滥用方面应当进行理论转型,从监督论走向制约论。The jurisdiction is controlled by 'restriction' and 'supervision' in order that the judicial power shall be exercised legally and properly in Criminal Procedure Law of China.The checking mechanism to the jurisdiction brings into play in some way.However,the adjudication supervision cannot act well.The adjudication supervision can’t accords with the demands of criminal litigation.It’s necessary to change the theory of preventing judges from misusing their authority from the theory of 'supervision' to the theory of 'checking'.

关 键 词：审判权 制约 监督 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学] D926.3[政治法律—法学]