胸腔镜辅助小切口与传统开胸手术治疗非小细胞肺癌远期疗效的临床对比研究  

Clinical contrast study on the long-term effect of video-assisted minithoracotomy and conventional thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer

作　　者：于潜[1] 田大力[1] 徐宝宁[1] 姜文军[1] 方辉[1] 李红媛[1] 刘思洋[1] 王天翔[1] 邹孔军 姜姝[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国医科大学附属第四医院胸外科,沈阳110032

出　　处：《中国临床实用医学》2014年第2期3-5,共3页China Clinical Practical Medicine

摘　　要：目的：比较胸腔镜辅助小切口和传统开胸手术对非小细胞肺癌治疗的远期疗效差异。方法回顾性分析80例非小细胞肺癌患者临床资料，对比不同术式治疗患者的总生存期和无进展生存期的差异。结果胸腔镜辅助小切口组和传统开胸手术组患者术后总生存期差异无统计学意义（P=0.264），无进展生存期差异无统计学意义（P=0.138）。结论胸腔镜辅助小切口和传统开胸手术对非小细胞肺癌治疗的远期疗效无明显差异，且胸腔镜辅助小切口手术具有手术创伤小、患者术后恢复快等优点，是分期较早肺癌患者的理想术式。ObjectiveTo evaluate the difference of long-term effect of video-assisted minithoracotomy(VAMT) and conventional thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). MethodsRetrospective analysis of 80 cases of NSCLC, their differences in overall survival (OS) and progression free time (PFS) were compared.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in OS of patients in two groups (P=0.264). There was also no statistically significant difference in PFS of patients in two groups(P=0.138).ConclusionThere was no significant difference in long-term effect of VAMT and conventional thoracotomy for NSCLC.VAMT had less injury and recovered soon after operationsis,It''s a reasonable and effective operation choice for early NSCLC.

关 键 词：电视胸腔镜辅助小切口手术 开胸手术 总生存期 无进展生存期 

分 类 号：R73[医药卫生—肿瘤] R81[医药卫生—临床医学]