检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈亚芸[1]
机构地区:[1]河南大学,河南开封475001
出 处:《太平洋学报》2014年第3期1-10,共10页Pacific Journal
基 金:国家哲学社会科学基金青年项目"国际法视域下中国转基因食品安全立法困境与出路研究"(13CFX109)子课题研究成果;2013年度河南省科技厅软科学项目"食品安全治理的公众参与机制研究"(132400410192)
摘 要:转基因食品国际援助面临着科学上的争议性、政策上的复杂性、欧美立法上的严重对立性、发展的不平衡性和国际协定的不一致性等重重矛盾。由于欧美转基因食品立法差异以及转基因食品国际援助法律规制的滞后,加之美国积极转嫁剩余转基因食品,争夺海外市场,试图影响受援国国内转基因食品立法,使得发展中国家处于被动和矛盾的地位。发展中国家作为主要的受援国,应平衡食物权、环境权、健康权和发展权之间的关系,积极改革现有食品援助体制,促使未来立法朝着有利于本国利益的方向发展。International Genetically Modified Food aid faces the challenge of scientific controversy,political complexity,contrariety of EU and USA legislations,unbalanced development and inconsistency of international regimes. Due to legislative differences between Europe and the United States and backward of international aid laws and regulations of genetically modified food,together with positive transfer surplus of genetically modified food of USA to overseas market,trying to influence recipient country's domestic genetically modified legislation,developing countries are in a passive and contradicted position. As major recipients of international food aid,developing countries should balance the right to food,the right of environment,the right to health and the right to development as well as take an active part in reforming existing international food aid regime and guarantee that new legislation in the future could benefit their own countries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3