矿产资源开发区与生态脆弱区吻合性分析——以贵州省为例  

Analysis on Anastomosis of Mineral Resource Developing Area and Ecological Fragile Region——Taking Guizhou Province as an Example

作　　者：侯湖平[1] 黄安平[1] 张绍良[1] 朱立军[1] 安艳玲[1] 王振山[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学环境与测绘学院,江苏徐州市221116

出　　处：《矿业研究与开发》2015年第1期103-108,共6页Mining Research and Development

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(51074154);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)

摘　　要：以贵州省矿产资源开发区和生态脆弱区为研究对象,从两种区域的特征分析入手,对区域破坏吻合特征、损毁空间吻合度、生态修复技术吻合度等方面进行分析比较,得出生态破坏机理都受当地岩层结构、地质地貌的影响,但生态脆弱区导致水土流失,矿产资源开发区导致地表沉陷、地裂缝等;空间上高度和中度破坏区是生态脆弱区和矿产资源开发区吻合的区域,采矿破坏区和脆弱区只受单一生态脆弱性或者采矿活动破坏的影响;不同类型区域,生态修复技术不同;在生态脆弱区和矿产资源开发区类型不吻合的空间区域,应以生态环境保护为重,采用不同的开采技术和生态修复技术,以保证贵州省经济和生态环境的可持续发展。Taking the mineral resource developing area and ecological fragile region of Guizhou province as a research object,the anastomoses of area damage characteristics,damage spatial distribution and ecological restoration technology were compared from characteristic analysis of two areas.Then,the results obtained as followed.Ecological failure mechanism was subjected to the influence of strata structure and geology geomorphology.Ecological fragile region caused the loss of soil and water,and the mineral resource developing area led to surface subsidence and ground fissure.From space,strong and moderate failure area was the anastomotic part of above two areas,and mining damage zone and fragile zone were only subjected to the influence of single ecological fragility or mining destruction.Furthermore,ecological restoration technology was various for different areas.In the inconsistent spatial region of two areas,the environmental protection should be emphasized by different mining technologies and ecological rehabilitation technologies,so as to ensure sustainable development of economy and ecological environment in Guizhou province.

关 键 词：矿产资源开发区 生态脆弱区 吻合度 贵州省 

分 类 号：X24[环境科学与工程—环境科学]