情境视角下的中国管理研究——路径与分析框架  

Chinese management research under context perspective:Path and analytical framework

作　　者：苏敬勤[1] 张琳琳[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学管理与经济学部,辽宁大连116023

出　　处：《科学学研究》2015年第6期824-832,858,共10页Studies in Science of Science

基　　金：国家自然科学基金重点项目(71033002);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71372082)

摘　　要：随着中国与西方存在显著情境差异的合理性得到越来越广泛的认同,具有中国特色的"情境"化因素越来越突出,如何从各种带有差异的情境对管理学问题进行深层次的解答,成为学术研究的一种必然。通过对国内管理领域有影响力的12个期刊1993-2012年筛选文献的扎根研究,本文考察了情境视角下的中国管理研究的现实路径、发展脉络和分析框架。结果发现,情境视角下的中国管理研究包括直接利用、现象分析、情境分析等三种主要路径;经历了从直接利用、聚焦于现象的有限情境化研究、聚焦于现象的深度情境化研究、聚焦于情境的深度情境化研究到聚焦于情境的有限情境化研究的发展脉络;以中国情境化研究方式、情境化程度和时间维度形成中国情境化分析关系框架,匹配为多种情境化分析方式;最后,结合以上分析,对情境化视角下的中国管理研究的未来发展方向提出建议。With the significant contextual differences between China and the West reasonable to be more widely recognized,'contextual'factors of Chinese characteristics become more prominent. How to deeply solve management issues from a variety of contexts with differences is a necessity for academic research. By conducting a grounded theory research on 12 domestic influential management journals from 1993 to 2012,we have,in this article,explored the context path,the development process and the analytical framework of Chinese contextualization research. By the results of our study,we have discovered that Chinese contextualization research has included three main paths of direct use,phenomena analysis and context analysis; and experienced from direct use,limited contextualization concerned about phenomenon,deep contextualization concerned about phenomenon,limited contextualization concerned about context and deep contextualization concerned about context; Chinese contextual paths,the degree of contextualization and time dimensions can form Chinese contextual analysis framework matching a variety of contextual analysis. We have finally,based on the above analysis,given some recommendations on the future direction of Chinese contextual research.

关 键 词：中国管理研究 情境化 扎根理论 路径 发展脉络 分析框架 

分 类 号：G311[文化科学]