因果理论功能主义及其物理主义论证  

Causal-theoretical Functionalism and Its Physicalist Argument

作　　者：陈晓平[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学公共管理学院,广东广州510006

出　　处：《深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2015年第5期20-25,共6页Journal of Shenzhen University：Humanities & Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"功能主义与心身问题研究"(10BZX020)

摘　　要：在当代心灵哲学中,功能主义占据主导地位;在功能主义中,因果理论功能主义影响巨大。因果理论功能主义试图通过"因果角色"这个概念来阐发心理本质及其与物理世界的关系,并借助于"拉姆齐-刘易斯方法"给出心理谓词的功能定义。金在权等人借助于图林机理论来证明功能主义在本体论上是物理主义的,但却遭遇"中文屋"论证的严重挑战。Functionalism dominates contemporary philosophy of mind. Causal-theoretical functionalism is influential in functionalism. Causal-theoretical functionalism tries to expound the nature of mind and its relation with the physical world by the concept of 'causal role', and makes the functional definition of psychological predicates with Ramsey-Lewis method. Drawing on the Turing machine theory, Kim and others try to clarify that functionalism is ontological physicalism, but are greatly challenged by the 'Chinese room ' argument.

关 键 词：因果理论功能主义 物理主义 因果角色 拉姆齐-刘易斯方法 “中文屋”论证 

分 类 号：B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]