检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]宁波大学师范学院,宁波315211 [2]兰州师范高等专科学校教育系,兰州730070
出 处:《心理科学》2004年第4期799-802,共4页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:本文受到全国教育科学"十五"规划项目资助 (CBB0 1 0 4 81 )。
摘 要:采用因果条件性逻辑推理研究的一般模式 ,研究了儿童社会信息因果推理发展状况。实验结果表明 :(1 )儿童社会信息推理能力呈年级性递增。 (2 )社会信息的内容会影响儿童社会信息推理的能力。 (3)儿童四种逻辑形式推理能力之间的差异显著 ,AC、DA在年级水平上差异都十分显著 ,但MP和MT在年级水平上差异不显著 ,儿童在各个年级四种推理能力之间的差异都显著 ,确定型和非确定型逻辑推理能力之间的差异显著。 (4)逻辑形式的难度。This study adopted the general pattern of logical reasoning with causal conditions to research the development of childrenren's social information reasoning with causal conditions. The results suggested: (1) The scope and reasoning ability of children's (from grade one to grade five) social information showed a steady age related increase. (2) The content of social cognition would affect the children's scope of social cognition and reasoning ability about social information. (3) There was a significant difference among children's reasoning ability of four logical forms. The difference between AC and DA was significant, but that between MP and MT was not. In all grades , children 's reasoning ability in four forms had significant diference; the difference between the logical form of certainty and that of uncertainty was significant.(4)The difficulty of logical forms and children's age would affect children's rationalization styles.
分 类 号:B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.254