检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鲁建光[1] 郭化敏[1] 王超[1] 肖玉丽[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院耳鼻咽喉科,哈尔滨150086
出 处:《临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志》2004年第6期332-333,共2页Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology
摘 要:目的 :探讨全喉切除Ⅰ期发声重建术的改进术式。方法 :采用低位气管切开 ,全喉切除 ,食管前壁黏膜重建声门 ,气管切口处造瘘 ,颈段气管上提并缩窄吻合于舌根的方法行全喉切除及Ⅰ期发声重建术 35例。结果 :33例 (94 .2 9% )术后获得了不同程度的发声功能 ,不能发声者仅 2例 (5 .71% )。全部患者术后均可经口进食 ,未出现严重的影响生存质量的误咽。结论 :与以往的发声重建术相比 ,本术式具有发声成功率高、发声质量良好、误咽率低等优点 ,且无须置入人工发声装置 ,值得推广。Objective:To investigate the improved methods of first stage speech reconstruction after total laryngectomy.Method:We improved the method of the first stage speech reconstruction after total laryngectomy with a low level tracheotomy, reconstruction of the glottis with the ahead mucous membrane of esophagus, making stoma at the incision of trachea, lifting and shrinking the cervical trachea and sewing up to the root of tongue. This novel method was adoptioned on 35 patients, the curative effect had been observed.Result:Among the 35 patients, 33 patients( 94.29 %)regained the phonation function to a different extent. Only 2 patients ( 5.71 %) could not speak. Most patients got an articulate and fluent voice. All of the patients could take food by mouth without severe miss deglutition.Conclusion:There are many excellences in our operation style. The success rate of the speech is higher, the quality of the speech is better and the rate of the miss deglutition is lower than the classical operation style of the speech reconstruction. It has no use for a factitious speech device and deserves to spread.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170