检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南开大学生物系
出 处:《动物分类学报》1993年第3期330-343,共14页Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica
摘 要:本文通对蛛缘蝽科各亚群16个代表属的比较形态学研究,以支序分析方法探讨了属间系统发育关系,其结果证实蛛缘蝽科为一单源群,支持Schaefe(1965)将该科分为蛛缘蝽亚科和微缘蝽亚科的意见,并认为扁缘蝽属和锥缘蝽属应分别单独成立族。Ahmad(1965)等将原有蛛缘蝽族、稻缘蝽族和微翅缘蝽族分别提升为亚科从而将该科分为三亚科的观点得不到文中支序图的支持。To date, very little research work has been done on the phylogeny of the Alydidae. Thepresent paper presents the results of a comparative morphological study of 16 representativegenera of this family and attempts to interpret the phylogenetic relationships among generafrom a cladistic approach. Results show that the Alydidae is a monphyletic group, that thegenera Daclera and Acestra should be separately erected as tribes, and that Schaefer's (1965)division of this family into two subfamilies--Alydidae and Micrelytrinae is reasonable. Ourcladograms do not support Ahmad's (1965) and some other authors' contention that the Aly-didae be divided into three subfamilies-Alydidae, Leptocorisinae, and Micrelytrinae. The nu-merous data on the comparative morphology, figures, adn phylogenetic schemes of this familyprovided in this paper would serve as useful information for further studies on this topic.
分 类 号:Q969.362.4[生物学—昆虫学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28