民事审前准备程序:目标、功能与模式  

A Research on the Aim, Function, and Pattern Of the Civil Pre-trial Preparation Procedure

作　　者：李浩[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学,江苏南京210097

出　　处：《政法论坛》2004年第4期3-9,共7页Tribune of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：我国的民事审前准备程序 ,除了需要实现效率的目标外 ,还需要满足公正的目标 ;除了应当具备整理和固定争点、收集和交换证据、促进当事人和解这些一般功能外 ,还应当具备防止先定后审、单方接触、强制调解、先入为主的特殊功能。应当根据合目的性的原则来选择我国的民事审前准备程序模式。我国目前实行的审前准备模式有审判法官型、法官助理型、预审法官型三种。预审法官型是一种相对优越的模式 ,该模式既有利于效率与公正的目标的实现 。The civil pre-trial preparation procedure of China should meet the need of both efficiency and justice. Chinese pre-trial system should not only be able to decide, collect, and exchange evidence to prompt the parties to conciliate, but also be able to prevent the phenomenon such as making decisions before trial, contacting one party to the litigation, compelling to mediate, and making judges having bias. we should decide our pre-trial procedure pattern according to the principle of conforming to the aim of justice. The current pre-trial pattern is divided into three types: trial judge pattern, judge assistant pattern, and pre-trial judge pattern. Pre-trial pattern is relatively proper, for this pattern could contribute to the aim of fairness and simultaneously exert all of the functions of the pre-trial procedure.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 审前准备 合目的性原则 预审法官模式 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]