检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑爱[1]
出 处:《新疆财经学院学报》2004年第3期56-59,共4页Journal of Xinjiang Finance & Economy Institute
摘 要:我国教育投资的制度变迁经历了强制性制度变迁和诱致性制度变迁两个阶段。在诱致性制度变迁阶段 ,教育投资总规模呈逐年扩大的趋势 ,教育投资主体呈现出多元化格局。但诱致性制度在创建和推行之初 ,教育投资对经济政策、财政政策、市场配置资源就已经产生了路径依赖 ,最终导致了一些低效率的锁定状态。要走出这些锁定状态 ,必须建立起单一与多元相结合的教育投资研究决策主体体系、分散与集中相结合的投资决策权力机制 ,中央政府应设立贫困地区义务教育工程 。Chinese education investment system experienced two phases: compulsive institutional variance and inducing institutional variance. During the period of inducing institutional variance, the total scale of education investment took on an expansive trend and the principal parts of education investment became more and more. When the inducing institution was set up, the education investment had produced “depending on route”, affected by economic policy, finance policy and allocating resource by the market. All those lead to low efficient states. We should build new decision-making body system of education investment and new investment mechanism of decision-making power. Central government should set up compulsory education work in the poor areas. We should create a new education investment mechanism that driven by profit.
关 键 词:教育投资 中国 制度变迁 新制度经济学 投资主体 利益驱动机制 投资规模 投资效率
分 类 号:G40-054[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15