无独立请求权第三人制度分解与重构  

System of the Third Party without Independent Right to Petition

作　　者：储育明[1] 王昌来[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院,安徽合肥230039

出　　处：《河北法学》2002年第4期49-53,共5页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：我国现行民事诉讼立法关于无独立请求权第三人制度的规定存在着不可调和的内在矛盾 ,理论上缺乏依据 ,实践中也没有起到应有的作用 ,甚至还适得其反 ,并且和国外立法形成了实质性的差异。提出取消无独立请求权第三人制度 ,并把它分解为两部分 :一部分是以原告身份起诉本诉原被告的第三人和被本诉原被告提起诉讼的第三人 ,两者和有独立请求权第三人统称为第三人 ,形成第三人之诉。取消有独立请求权第三人的称谓。另一部分为主动申请参加到他人已经开始的诉讼中支持一方当事人并为其提供证据的证人。There exists irreconcilable inner contradiction on system of third party without independent right to petition in Chinese civil procedural laws, having lacks of theoretical basis and failing in function, even just opposite to what the legislation wishes and greatly different from foreign relative legislation. So the system should be abolished and divided into two parts-the first part is the third party who sues the original plaintiff and defendant as a plaintiff or who is sued by the original plaintiff and defendant, these along with the third party having dependent right to petition are called by a joint name as the third party and they form third party action; the other is the witness who offers to take part in other's action having been started to support one party with evidences presented by himself.

关 键 词：无独立请求权第三人制度 民事诉讼法 中国 价值目标 司法公正 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]