沉默权之我见  

My Viewpoint of the Reticent Right

作　　者：陈闻高[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川省人民警察学校,四川泸州646000

出　　处：《公安理论与实践（上海公安高等专科学校学报）》2000年第2期1-7,共7页Journal of Shanghai Police College

摘　　要：我国法律中没有明确赋予嫌疑人沉默权,但从遏制刑讯逼供、保障人权、民主诉讼、准确司法的角度看,有必要确立沉默权。“不必自我归罪”是沉默权的司法原则,侦讯仍是一种取证手段。沉默权不能同“老实交待”对立起来。强调“认罪服法”与“不必自我归罪”原则是相冲突的。“不必自我归罪”并非不可以“自我归罪”,“坦白从宽”应得到兑现。被迫供述与自愿供述都可采用为证据。Suspects are not clearly entitled to the reticent right in Chinese law. But from the viewpoint to contain extorting a confession by torture, guarantee human right and that of the democratic lawsuit and accurate judicature, it' s necessary to establish the reticent right. 'Not necessary to profess oneself guilty' is the judicial principle of the reticent right, and investigation and interrogation is a means to obtain evidence. The reticent right can't be antagonistic to 'honest confession' . It' s contradictary to stress both the 'admit oneself guilty and submit to law' and 'not necessary to profess oneself guilty' principles. 'Not necessary to profess oneself guilty', 'give lenient disposal if confessing' should be hon-ored. Both the compelled and willing confessions can be adopted as evidence.

关 键 词：沉默权 犯罪嫌疑人 刑讯逼供 人权保障 侦查人员 口供 证据 

分 类 号：D915.33[政治法律—诉讼法学]