检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学心理学院,100875
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2004年第9期628-630,627,共4页Chinese Mental Health Journal
摘 要:目的 :检测工作控制点量表 (WLCS)的信度和效度。方法 :根据 43 9名被试的WLCS结果作了同质信度、构想效度的检验 ,以Rotter控制点量表为效标考察了WLCS的同时效度 ,以职业压力指标问卷(OSI -2 )中身体健康、心理健康、工作满意度和离职意向分量表为效标考察了WLCS的预测效度。结果 :WLCS的内部一致性α系数为 0 7166,分半信度为 0 715 9;同时效度为 0 60 5 (P <0 0 0 1) ;对身体健康、心理健康、工作满意度和离职意向的预测效度都达到显著水平。结论 :WLCS的同质信度、构想效度、效标效度均较理想 ,符合心理测量学的要求。Objective:To build the reliability and validity of Work Locus of Control Scale (WLCS) Methods:To analyze the internal reliability of the WLCS based on the 439 cases from the first survey, to get its convergent validity based on the 88 cases from the second survey on WLCS and Rotter’s Internal-External Locus of Control Scale and to explore its nomological network based on the data of the first survey on the psychological well-being, physical well-being, job satisfaction and turnover subscales of Occupational Stress Indicators-2 (OSI-2) Results:Alpha index and Equal-length Spearman-Brown Index of WLCS were both 0 72 the convergent validity was 0 61(P<0 01) There were also significant nomological correlation between its every subscale and that form OSI-2 Conclusion:The internal reliability and construct validity of WLCS are both adequate from the view of psychometrics
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145