检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张一弛[1]
出 处:《中国工业经济》2004年第9期87-94,共8页China Industrial Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目"我国人力资源管理方式与企业绩效之间的关系研究"(批准号70002001)
摘 要:本文通过比较分析发现传统国有企业与民营企业在人力资源管理的基础工作和企业内部程序公平两个方面都显著落后于外资企业,传统国有企业在工作组织方式和外部人才引进两个方面都显著落后于民营企业与外资企业。进一步分析发现我国企业人力资源管理模式内部政策措施之间存在着结构性失调现象,揭示出我国企业人力资源管理模式与所有制性质之间的关系反映了权变主义和制度环境的联合影响。Based on cluster analysis, this article identified two modes of human resource management (HRM) employed by Chinese firms: control system and commitment system. Empirical evidence showed a relative close relation between modes of HRM and ownership for firms in China. Further investigation found that both SOEs and domestic private firms fell behind foreign firms in fundamental HRM work and in within-firm procedural justice, and SOEs fell behind both domestic private firms and foreign firms in employee involvement and in external talent acquisition. Inconsistency of practices within any modes identified, suggested modes of quasi-control and quasi-commitment, shed some light on an atypical relationship of contingency between modes of HRM and ownership types and also provided some evidence for institutional theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117