对不同工人群体SCL-90的元分析  

A Meta-analysis on SCL-90 of Different Worker Groups

作　　者：李永文[1] 陈龙[1] 马煊[1] 曹伟跃[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学院心理研究所,北京100101 [2]北京中医药大学,北京100029

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2004年第3期299-301,303,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

摘　　要：目的 :比较分析不同工人群体SCL - 90九因子与全国常模的差异。方法 :收集筛选出近 10年关于不同工人群体的SCL - 90研究成果 30项 ,将其九个因子得分与常模进行效应量值计算 ,并对 30项研究的各因子分进行聚类分析。结果 :不同工人群体SCL - 90的 30项研究与全国常模比较的平均效应量值d为 0 .36 ;九个因子的d值 ,只有躯体化为 0 .82 ,处在高水平 ,其他八个因子均在 0 .5 0以下 ,处在低水平 ;聚类分析的结果与其一致。结论 :除个别特殊物理环境下的工人外 ,不同工人群体的心理健康基本正常。 1986年全国常模的躯体化分量表有进一步研究的需要 ;Objective:To compare the differences between factors of SCL-90 of different worker samples and the national norm.Methods: 30 articles on SCL-90 of worker samples in the past decade were reviewed. Effect size of 9 SCL-90 factors were compared with the national norm of 1986, and cluster analyses were proceeded on the factors of 30 samples.Results: The mean effect size (d) between 30 samples and the norm was 0.36. All of the d values were low except somatization (0.82). Structures of cluster-analysis were similar to scores of factors and d values. Conclusion:The mental health of these samples were basically normal except a few that were in special physical environments. The somatization of 1986's norm need to be renewed while other factors of the norm are feasible for further studies on SCL-90 of worker samples.

关 键 词：SCL-90 元分析 常模 心理健康 

分 类 号：R395.6[哲学宗教—心理学]