检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]吉林化学工业集团公司总医院,吉林,吉林,132021 [2]吉林市中心医院,吉林吉林,132011
出 处:《北华大学学报(自然科学版)》2004年第4期335-337,共3页Journal of Beihua University(Natural Science)
摘 要:目的探讨应用立体定向微创血肿清除术治疗有严重神经功能障碍的脑内小血肿.方法选择有严重神经功能障碍(CSS≥18)的脑内小血肿病例71例,随机分成2组,分别采用立体定向微创血肿清除术进行治疗(38例)及内科保守治疗(33例).结果立体定向微创血肿清除术在血肿清除速度上明显快于内科保守治疗,1周内血肿减少量分别是74.11%及16.61%,同时神经功能恢复速度亦明显优于内科保守治疗,在1周内CSS下降分别是30.02%及7.32%.结论立体定向微创血肿清除术对脑内小血肿的治疗,在血肿清除速度、神经功能恢复速度上均明显优于内科保守治疗.ObjectiveTo explore the stereotactic minimal invasive hemorrhage clearing in treating small intracerebral hemorrhage with severe neuro-functional damage(CSS≥18).Methods71 patients with small intracerebral hemorrhage with severe neuro-functional damage(CSS≥18) were divided into two groups at random. One group(n=38) was treated by the stereotactic minimal invasive hemorrhage clearing, the other(n=33) was cured by internal medical treatment.ResultsThe speed of hemorrhage clearing in the first group was fast than the latter,the volume of hemorrhage clearing were (74.11%) and (16.61%) separately in one week. The speed of neuro-functional recovering in the first group was also fast than the latter, the drop in CSS were (30.02%) and (7.32%) respectively in one week.ConclusionThe stereotactic minimal invasive hemorrhage clearing in treating small intracerebral hemorrhage with severe neuro-functional damage was better than the internal medical treatment in the speed of hemorrhage clearing and neuro-functional recovering.
分 类 号:R743[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15