寻求刑法解释的客观性  

On the Objectivity of Criminal Law Interpretation

作　　者：沈琪[1] 郭开元[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院,北京100088 [2]枣庄师范专科学校政史系,山东枣庄277160

出　　处：《枣庄师专学报》2004年第5期79-83,共5页Journal of Zaozhuang Teachers' College

摘　　要：客观性向来是刑法解释追求的目标,但哲学解释学给传统刑法解释的客观性以前所未有的冲击。在哲学解释学的理论背景中重求刑法解释的客观性,可以发现刑法解释的客观性存在于解释者的前见与各种客观因素的相互对话和各种客观因素对前见的有力制约中,这种客观性不是自然科学意义上的绝对的客观性,而是波斯纳所谓的交流意义上的合理性。Objectivity has been the aim of the criminal law interpretation, however, philosophical hermeneutic gives the traditional (objectivity). This paper tries to pursue the objectivity in the background of philosophical hermeneutic, arguing that the objectivity of (criminal) law interpretation lies in the conversation and inter-restriction between the prejudice of interpreter and kinds of objective (elements), thus objectivity is not the absolute objectivity in natural science sense, it is the rationality in Posner′s so-called (intercommunion) sense.

关 键 词：刑法解释 波斯纳 解释者 客观性 制约 哲学解释学 理论背景 自然科学 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]