检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国针灸》2004年第11期750-752,共3页Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
摘 要:目的 :对比腹针与体针治疗腰椎间盘膨 (突 )出症的疗效差异。方法 :将 114例患者随机分为治疗组 6 2例、对照组 5 2例。治疗组采用腹针治疗 ,对照组采用体针治疗。结果 :治疗组治愈率为71 0 % ,总有效率为 98 4 % ;对照组分别为 4 8 1%、86 5 %。两组比较差异均有显著性意义 (P <0 0 5 ) ,治疗组治愈率、总有效率均优于对照组。从治疗次数上看 ,腹针所需次数比体针次数少 ,差异有显著性意义 (P <0 0 5 )。结论 :腹针治疗本病疗效好 ,疗程短。Objective To observe the difference of therapeutic ef fects between abdominal acupuncture and body acupuncture on prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc. Methods One hundred and fourteen cases we re randomly divided into a treatment group (n=62) and a control group (n =52). They were treated respectively by abdominal acupuncture and body acupunct ure. Results The cured rate and the total effective rate were 71.0% and 98.4% in th e treatment group, and 48.1% and 86.5% in the control group, respectively, with sig nificant differences between the two groups (P<0.05), the treatment group being better than the control group. The treatment times needed for the abdominal acupuncture were less than those for body acupuncture with a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion Abdominal acupuncture has a good therapeutic effect on prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc with a short therapeutic course.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3