检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张博[1]
出 处:《语言教学与研究》2004年第4期36-45,共10页Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies
基 金:教育部人文社科重点研究基地2002-2003年度重大项目(项目批准号:02JAZJD740006);国家汉办"十五"科研规划项目(项目批准号:HBK01-05/015)的资助
摘 要:符淮青(1985)提出应从“词源”和“现时语感”两个角度观察同形同音词与多义词的词义联系,实际上为现代汉语同形同音词和多义词的区分确立了“历时-共时”双重限定的基本原则。本文认为,为能准确鉴别词语有无词源上和(或)现时的意义联系,还必须有一套切当可行的分析方法,不能仅仅依凭分析者的主观感觉加以定夺。本文结合《现代汉语词典》单音节同形同音词分立的得失,重点讨论区分现代汉语同形同音词与多义词的4种方法:义素分析法、词源考索法、引申义列梳理法、相关比较法。Fu Huaiqing (1985) established a basic synchronic-diachronic guideline to distinguish perfect homonyms from polysemes when he proposed to observe the semantic relations of the two in terms of etymology and actual linguistic intuition. This paper argues that the etymological relations among words and/or their synchronic semantic relations cannot be determined only by the subjective intuition of an analyst, and that there should be a set of feasible methods of analysis. The author discusses four methods to distinguish perfect homonyms from polysemes in modern Chinese, with reference to the advantages and disadvantages of listing monosyllabic homonyms as seperate entries in The Contemporary Chinese Dictionary. The four methods differ in applicability and efficacy and in many cases they should be used in combination.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62