非法证据排除规则的理论误区与规则重构  

Misapprehension and Reconstruction of the Exclusion Rule of Illegal Evidence

作　　者：马贵翔 倪泽仁[2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江省杭州商学院,浙江杭州310035 [2]国家检察官学院,北京100041

出　　处：《国家检察官学院学报》2002年第1期74-77,84,共5页Journal of National Prosecutors College

摘　　要：非法证据排除规则忽视了诉讼结构加工信息的特有功能 ,证据具有的自在性、必然发现性以及公用性使得非法方法不能作为断送证据“前途”的合理理由 ,考虑到公民无权把隐私权和沉默权作为隐藏犯罪证据的手段 。The exclusion rule of illegal evidence overlooks the unique function of court trials,i.e.,producing information.The objectivity,discoverability and obtainability of evidence make illegal evidence cannot simply be justifiably inadmissible.Considering that an individual is not entitled to conceal evidence by virtue of his rights of privacy and silence,it is suggested that a rule concerning the legality proof and the right of risk choices of judicial personnel should be introduced.

关 键 词：非法证据 排除规则 诉讼结构 事后证明 风险选择 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]