我国公诉方式的结构性缺陷及其矫正  

The Structural Defects of the Methods of Public Prosecution and the Correction

作　　者：陈卫东[1] 郝银钟[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《法学研究》2000年第4期101-115,共15页Chinese Journal of Law

摘　　要：本文对我国现行公诉方式的结构性缺陷以及在诉讼实务中滋生的种种弊端进行了全面、深入的考察和分析 ,明确提出复印件主义公诉方式与我国抗辩制庭审形式所追求的价值理念是相互冲突的 ,同时也不符合刑事诉讼的规律性要求 ,因而应予废止 ;在刑事诉讼中防止伏击审判和法官预断现象的最有效措施 ,是在刑事诉讼结构中确立起诉书一本主义、诉因制度和证据展示制度 ,由上述三项诉讼制度所构筑的公诉方式是抗辩制庭审形式不可或缺的有机组成部分。This thesis investigates and analyses the structural shortcomings of public prosecution ——style and all sorts of abuses in the lawsuit practice comprehensively and deeply, and clearly puts forward that the duplicate——doctrine of public prosecution——style is conflicting with the ideas of value which our adversary ways of court trials seek, and also does not accord with the law demands of criminal procedure, so it should be abrogated. The most effective measure to guard against the ambush trial and prejudge in the criminal procedure are to establish the charge-statement-only doctrine and the count and also the disclosure of evidence in the criminal proceeding structure which are organic parts of the adversary ways of court trials.

关 键 词：公诉 抗辩制 庭审 刑事诉讼 复印件主义 起诉书 诉因制度 结构性缺陷 中国 方式 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学] D926[政治法律—法学]