检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾雨辰[1] 刘琦[1] 叶华[1] 王振堂[1] 田建明[1] 王飞[1] 孙飞[1] 陆建平[1] 杨继金[1] 贺佳[1]
出 处:《介入放射学杂志》1993年第1期5-8,共4页Journal of Interventional Radiology
摘 要:本文对468例原发性肝癌的不同介入治疗方法的疗效进行了比较研究。分单纯化疗(A)组,化疗碘油栓塞(B)组和化疗、碘油、明胶海绵栓塞(C)组,三者的有效率分别为20.29%、41.18%和44.77%。1、3年生存率,A组为20.53±3.62%、1.95±2.39%,B组51.34±4.36%、10.11±4.92%,C组62.99±3.89%、13.92±4.65%。A、B、C三组的平均生存期分别为9.57月,16.07月和17.93月。A与B、C组之间有明显差别,以化疗,碘油和明胶海绵复合栓塞的疗效最好。对栓塞的分类提出了:远、中、近三段分类法。This article is composed of a comparative study on the curative effects of different interventional therapies for 468 cases with primary liver cancer dividing into three groups: group A with simple chemotherapy, group B with chemotherapy and lipiodol embolization, and group C with chemotherapy, lipiodol and gelform embolization. The effective rates were 20.29%, 41.18% and 44.77% respectively. The survival rates of 1 year and 3 years were 20.53±3.62% and 1.95±2.39% for group A, 51.34±4.36% and 10.11±4.92% for group B, 62.99±3.89% and 13.92±4.65% for group C.; with the mean survival durations of 9.57 months, 16.07 months and 17.93 months. There was a high significant difference between group A and group B.C. The most effective therapy was chemotherapy plus lipiodol and gelform embolization. The embolization method was divided into far, middle and near section three types.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117