“一事不再理”的法理与立法选择  

A Study of the Principle of Non Bis in Idem

作　　者：秦宗文[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610064

出　　处：《现代法学》2004年第5期88-95,共8页Modern Law Science

摘　　要：大陆法中的“一事不再理”与英美法中的“禁止双重危险”既有共通之处,也有差异;联合国文件确立的“一事不再理”是二者的折衷性表述。修改《刑诉法》进行的利益格局调整中,有必要确立“一事不再理”原则,同时作适当保留。为贯彻“一事不再理”原则,有必要在《刑诉法》中明确规定该原则及判断案件同一性的标准,同时应改革法院作出证据不足的无罪判决后检察院可以重新起诉的规定和再审制度。Non bis in idem, a principle in continental law, overlaps to some extent and at the same time differs from the common law principle-double jeopardy. The principle of non bis in idem appears in the papers of the United Nations is a compromise of the continental law and the common law. While amending the Criminal Procedure Act, it is necessary for us to establish non bis in idem to meet the demand of different interests. But some exceptions should be retained. In order to apply it well, the principle should be expressly defined in the Act and standards set to determine the similarities of cases. At the same time, we should make some provisions and set up a regime to ensure that prosecution can re - prosecute the suspect and the court can retry the case if the case was dismissed for lack of evidence.

关 键 词：一事不再理原则 立法 再审制度 刑事诉讼法 禁止双重危险原则 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]