我国行政诉讼原告资格制度发展的社会背景及其得失评价——以最高人民法院2000年有关司法解释为对象  

On the Social Background of Plaintiff's Capacity in Administrative Proceedings and Its Merits—— A View of the 2000 New Judicial Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court

作　　者：高新华[1] 

机构地区：[1]常熟理工学院,江苏常熟215500

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2004年第6期42-50,共9页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：20世纪90年代是我国社会转型的关键十年。这一时期,市场经济体制逐步发展,民主政治体制逐步发展,行政法制建设不断进步,行政法治理论不断成熟。在社会变迁的大背景下出台的新司法解释对我国行政诉讼原告资格进行重新界定,转变了原告资格的价值取向,明确了不可诉行为的范围,赋予更广泛的行政相对人以原告资格。但新司法解释在行政诉讼原告资格的属人因素及属事因素上作出了限制性规定,有些规定甚至是对行政诉讼法规定的倒退。为使我国行政诉讼原告资格继续向逐步放宽的世界性趋势发展,最高人民法院在这类司法解释方面还将承担更为艰巨的重任。The 1990s' was a crucial decade for the social reform in China, during which the market economy further developed, democratic politics was improved, the regime of administrative litigation was established and the theory of administrative law matured. Under such circumstances, the Supreme People's Court brought about the Judicial Interpretation of 1999, which converted the value tropism of a plaintiff's capacity, defined what could not be appealed, and increased the plaintiff's capacity in the administrative proceedings. But still there remain some restrictions. For example, both the personal factors and the event factors related to the plaintiff's capacity are under restrictions. And in comparison with the Administrative Proceeding Act, some regulations are indeed retrograde. To follow the global trend of increasing plaintiff- capacity, the Supreme People's Court and its judicial interpretation will face more challenges.

关 键 词：原告资格 行政诉讼 司法解释 最高人民法院 行政法制建设 行政法治理论 行政相对人 发展 中国 出台 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学] D92[政治法律—法学]