村党组织成员为“其他依法从事公务的人员”质疑——兼论村党组织成员为“准国家工作人员”之立法完善  

To oppugn a member of COCPC to be the other persons who perform publics ervice according to law

作　　者：石经海[1] 

机构地区：[1]阜阳师范学院政法系,安徽阜阳236032

出　　处：《阜阳师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2004年第6期89-91,共3页Journal of Fuyang Normal University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：剖析关于我国刑法第 93条第 2款的立法解释 ,村党组织成员并没有当然地包括在“其他依照法律从事公务的人员”之内。因此 ,实践中当然地把那些越权协助行政管理的村党组织成员认定为“准国家工作人员”并不符合罪刑法定原则对刑事司法的要求 ;可鉴于这些行为的现实社会危害性 ,有必要把他们明确纳入“其他依照法律从事公务的人员” ,这是罪刑法定原则对刑事立法的基本要求。To analyze the legislation analysis on provisio n 2, Article 93 in our criminal law, a member of the country organization of Chine se Communist Party(COCPC) hasn't been the other persons who perform public servi ce according to law without doubt. So it is not consonant with the requirement o f the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime to rega rd the members of the organization who exceed their authority in assisting the a dministrative affairs in practice as state functionaries. But taking into accoun t of the actual society harm of these actions to exceed their authority, it is n ecessary to regard them as the other persons who perform public service accordin g to law in legislation in accordance with the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime.

关 键 词：公务 党组织 准国家工作人员 罪刑法定原则 刑事司法 越权 立法解释 质疑 成员 要求 

分 类 号：C934[经济管理—管理学] D924[政治法律—刑法学]