社交焦虑个体的注意偏差实验研究  

Attentional Bias in Social Anxious Individuals

作　　者：陈曦[1] 钟杰[1] 钱铭怡[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学心理学系,100871

出　　处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2004年第12期846-849,共4页Chinese Mental Health Journal

基　　金：国家自然科学基金 (批准号 :30 370 4 83)的资助

摘　　要：目的 :考查威胁和非威胁两种实验情景下高低社交焦虑个体对威胁性词语的注意偏差。方法 :根据在社交焦虑量表上的得分从 2 64名大一学生中筛选出 16名高分组成员和 16名低分组成员 ,并将被试随机分入威胁性和非威胁性两种实验情景 ,完成点探测任务。结果 :实验情景的主效应显著 [F(1,3 1) =4 3 5 3 ,p=0 0 46] ,与非威胁性情景相比 ,被试在威胁性情景下倾向于对威胁性词语警觉 ;社交焦虑的主效应不显著 [F(1,3 1) =0 676,p =0 418] ;实验情景和社交焦虑的交互作用边缘显著 [F(1,3 1) =4 0 45 ,p =0 0 5 4]。 结论 :只有在非威胁性情景下 ,高社交焦虑个体才表现出对威胁性词语的回避 ;特质焦虑对注意偏差的影响不显著。Objective: To study the al attentional bias to threatening words of high and low social anxiety subjects (Ss) in the threatening and non-threatening conditions. Methods:16 high social anxious (HSA) Ss and 16 low social anxious (LSA) Ss responded to a dot-probe task, nearly half of them were chosen randomly to execute the task under the threatening condition (expecting to give a 3-min speech), the other half were not.Results:The main effect of experiment condition was significant (F (1,31)=4.353, p=0.046), indicating that Ss under the threatening condition showed more attention vigilance to threatening words. The main effect of social anxiety wasn’t significant (F (1,31)=0.676, p=0.418). The interaction between the expectation of social threat and social anxiety was marginal significant (F (1,31)=4.045, p=0.054). Conclusion: HSA Ss tended to avoid threatening words only under non-threatening condition. In addition, trait anxiety didn’t affect attentional bias significantly in this study.

关 键 词：社交焦虑 实验研究 威胁 量表 性情 影响 偏差 情景 得分 高分 

分 类 号：R749.72[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学] G633[医药卫生—临床医学]