汉语语音史中的双线发展  

Bipartite Development in Chinese Historical Phonology

作　　者：张光宇[1] 

机构地区：[1]台湾新竹清华大学语言所

出　　处：《中国语文》2004年第6期545-557,共13页Studies of the Chinese Language

摘　　要：高本汉对汉语语音史研究的贡献可分已竟之业和未竟之业两项。前者主要的工作内容是串连历史文献,形成所谓直线发展观;后者系从比较法透视而来,形成所谓双线发展观。直线发展观下,方言差异遭到漠视;音变条件据韵图加以翻译,有违比较法精神。经由双线发展观,可以较好地廓清历史文献的性质,解释方言屡见的例外。对高本汉来说,他心中所悬的双线发展只是一个愿景,终其一生并未付诸实践。Karlgren's contribution to the study of Chinese historical phonology can be divided into twocategories:accomplished and unaccomplished.The former put emphasis on written records,forming what has been called'the straight-line development';the later gleaned from applying thecomparative method that can be termed as the'bipartite development'point of view.Under thestraight-line point of view,dialect differences were largely ignored while the so-called conditioningfactor of sound change sought through mere translation from rhyme tables,in contravention of theprinciples inherent in the comparative method.The nature of written documents and the recurringexceptions found in dialects can be better explained,with the help of bipartite perspectives,avision that was never put into practice throughout Karlgren's life.

关 键 词：汉语语音 方言 韵图 音变 翻译 差异 解释 历史文献 贡献 发展观 

分 类 号：H11[语言文字—汉语] H172