检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王霁[1]
机构地区:[1]南京邮电学院,江苏南京210003
出 处:《行政与法》2005年第1期82-84,共3页Administration and Law
摘 要:职位分类制度是加强对公务员管理的重要制度,自美国开创职位分类制度以来,各国纷纷推行公务员的职位分类制度,中国也不例外。但是各国的职位分类制度各有特色,有优点也有不足。中国的职位分类制度同样存在许多问题,本文旨在借鉴国外公务员职位分类的优点以完善我国的公务员职位分类制度。Position classification system is an important system for strengthening the management of public officials.Ever since the system was first created in the United States,many countries have also set up their own office position classification system,including China. However,these position classification systems have different features,with both strong points and weaknesses. In view of the problems existing in China's position classification system,this paper aims to learn from the position classification systems of other countries so as to perfect our own system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.86.123