检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:迟松剑[1]
机构地区:[1]北京人民警察学院,北京102202
出 处:《北京人民警察学院学报》2005年第1期30-33,共4页Journal of Beijing People‘s Police College
摘 要:最新的《宪法修正案》明确了我国尊重和保障人权的立场,党的十六大报告提出了完善诉讼程序保障公民和法人的合法权益的主张。侦查阶段对犯罪嫌疑人人权的保障尤为引人注目。充分认识保障犯罪嫌疑人人权的重要性,客观分析我国侦查阶段犯罪嫌疑人人权保障的现状,既应看到立法与司法实践方面的长足发展与进步,也应看到其中仍存在刑讯逼供、超期羁押等严重问题,对此,我们应认真分析原因,并在此基础上进一步探讨解决问题的途径。The latest Constitution Amendments states clearly the Chinese government standpoint of respecting and protecting human rights. It has been written in the report of the 16th party congress to perfect the litigant proceeding so as to protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens and juridical persons. The safeguard of suspects' human rights in the phase of criminal investigation has therefore come to focus. In order to obtain a full awareness of its significance and its present situation in China, one has to see both the big progress in the practice of legislation and law enforcement and the serious problems during the investigation such as inquisition by torture and overdetainment. What's more, only by doing a profound analysis of the cause can one find the way out.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28