检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院中国协和医科大学北京协和医院眼科,北京100730
出 处:《中国医学科学院学报》2004年第6期682-686,共5页Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
摘 要:目的评价2型糖尿病患者泪膜功能并探讨其影响因素。方法对111例2型糖尿病患者和100例健康对照者进行泪膜功能评价。2型糖尿病患者分别按年龄、糖尿病病程、血糖控制情况、眼底病变进行分组。分别进行眼干症状询问、泪膜破裂时间(BUT)测定、角膜荧光素染色、基础泪液分泌试验(SchirmerI试验,SIt)和泪膜脂质层形态观察。根据上述检查结果进行干眼评分。结果2型糖尿病组的干眼评分(3.28±1.56)高于对照组(2.31±1.50,P<0.01);BUT(6.50±4.84)s低于对照组(12.26±7.16)s(P<0.01);SIt(10.61±6.86)mm与对照组(10.92±7.05)mm差异无显著性(P>0.05)。2型糖尿病组的干眼症患病率为19.8%,高于对照组8.0%(P<0.05)。对2型糖尿病患者按照眼底分为3组无糖尿病性视网膜病变组、背景性糖尿病性视网膜病变组、增殖性糖尿病性视网膜病变组,3组的干眼评分分别为2.95±1.50、3.38±1.48和4.11±1.60(P<0.01);SIt分别为(10.95±6.89)mm、(11.71±7.30)mm和(7.63±5.20)mm(P>0.05);BUT分别为(7.53±5.23)s、(5.88±4.10)s和(4.47±4.17)s(P<0.05);对有眼底病变者分为已行激光治疗组和未行激光治疗组,两组的干眼评分分别为4.71±1.14和3.26±1.15(P<0.01);BUT分别为(2.93±2.06)s和(6.26±4.36)s(P<0.01);SIt分别为(7.21±6.Objective To study the tear film function of patients with type 2 diabetes and to investigate the risk factors of dry eye in these patients. Methods Totally 111 patients with type 2 diabetes and 100 age-and sex-matched control subjects were studied. Tear film function was evaluated by dry eye syndrome tear breaking up timeBUT corneal fluorescein staining Schirmer I testSIt and tear film lipid layer observation with tear scope. Dye eye score was calculated with the results of these tests. ResultsWhen compared with the controls patients with type 2 diabetes showed higher dry eye score(diabetics 3.28 ± 1.56,control 2.31 ± 1.50,P < 0.01)and faster BUTdiabetics6.50 ± 4.84s,control12.26 ± 7.16s P < 0.01 but similar SItdiabetics10.61 ± 6.86s,control10.92 ± 7.05s P > 0.05. More diabetic patients were diagnosed as dry eyediabetics 19.8%,control 8.0% P < 0.05. According to their retinopathy the diabetic patients were divided into three groups without diabetic retinopathyDR with background DR and with proliferative DR. For these three groups the dry eye scores were 2.95 ± 1.50 3.38 ± 1.48 and 4.11±1.60 respectivelyP < 0.01 the SIt were10.95 ± 6.89mm11.71±7.30mm and7.63 ± 5.20mm respectivelyP > 0.05 the BUT were7.53 ± 5.23s5.88 ± 4.10s and4.47 ± 4.17sP < 0.05. Patients with DR were then devided into two groups with photocoagulation and without photocoagulation. For these two groups the dry eye scores were 4.71 ± 1.14 and 3.26 ± 1.15 respectivelyP < 0.01 the BUT were2.93 ± 2.06s and6.26 ± 4.36s respectivelyP < 0.01 the SIt were7.21 ± 6.51mm and11.33 ± 6.73mm respectivelyP < 0.05;the rates of corneal fluorescein staining were 50.0% and 17.9% respectivelyP < 0.05. Dry eye score had a good correlation with diabetic retino-pathy and photocoagulationP < 0.01�
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117